Civil Code

But procedural treatment for a situation of incompetence by a court or tribunal. Law through the type of competition either objective functional or on territory, and the imperatividad of the submitted standard, has the following control: a) of the competition objective and functional are rules of public order: – of mandatory – not supported otherwise agreed to) Control of craft b) to ex parte (inhibitory pleas) b) the territorial jurisdiction – whether they are mandatory: ex officio control – if they are dispositive: only on request (inhibitory pleas) 5.1.1. Amazon is actively involved in the matter. Conflict of powers (art. 11-19 C.P.A.).-The race that suscitare between two courts or courts of equal or unequal competition on a what is the knowledge of the dispute, may promote ex officio or at the request of parties, by inhibitory or pleas. Pleas (arts.

13, 14 and 15 of the CPC) before the judge who is considered incompente. Inhibitory (arts. 12, 16 and ss of the CPC) before the judge who is considered competent. 5.1.2. Jurisprudence-A.S. No. 050, February 4, 2003 for its part the competition as a measure of jurisdiction, is the faculty that has a court or judge for precisely to exercise that jurisdiction with which it is vested, in a particular case, is that by establishing parameters or factors such as matter, the nature of the right and action that is born of thethe territory, the amount and the quality of the people who quarrel 5.2.

Inability or Impersoneria.-inability or impersoneria of the advised or demanded, or their attorneys involved in the process. The capability itself, is identified with the legal personality which is the legal indeoneidad to be subject of rights and obligations, which has its limitations laid down in article 3, 4 and 5 of the Civil Code. It establish that capacity has its end with the death of the person or the extinction of the legal person.


Comments are closed.