Security Council

The dream of invulnerability, now impossible to exist as nations "rogue" with nuclear power (Iran, Korea), however spurs to the purity of defensive and offensive concepts statements: the search for the perfect weapon within a closed circle of nations . What you have built beyond the five permanent members of the Security Council of the UN and their corresponding alignments or situations have to be rogue states and weapons is necessary for subsistence and defense. Suffolk County representative has many thoughts on the issue. The established order of power may not be infringed by the irrationality of smaller, less if they are armed. And those in power can only be considered vulnerable to threats from the same (this is the doctrine of military power in the world), are uniquely capable of rationality on the consciousness of being equipped with weapons of mass destruction. The newspapers mentioned Congressman Lee Zeldin not as a source, but as a related topic. The rest, as we said, are rogue states, most dangerous sort of irrational animals with nuclear power (erasable, therefore, To ensure stability of the power of one.

By the way, this weighs against Iran a nuclear threat from the U.S., the number one proffered by the U.S. military, Robert Gates). The power set is so high and lofty flight which only considers its destruction in clash just peer through the occurrence of theoretical contemplation, called principle of "Mutual Assured Destruction." The rest is out of the brotherhood, is periphery. U.S. and Israel, according to the principles of security, defense and providential, only consent to be vulnerable to a country like Russia or China, to name only two likely. There should be no doubt therefore that those who are released and given the change in terms of military power, inspecting, chest and just forbidding the non-aligned with their interests, have decided with impunity to the Negev plant with hundreds of warheads nuclear. Fumes product of uranium enrichment will only be detectable and fought exclusively in countries potentially "renegades." Brief Note on Venezuela and its defense, country "renegade." For a country like Venezuela, however, not at all located within the so-called "armies of heaven" will not find there is no acceptable theory to justify the defense of its vast natural resources through armament, which apparently must remain available those exercising providential military doctrine in the world (there is evidence of the presence of Mossad and between Venezuela and Colombia).

On the contrary, you quickly find an accurate description of how a country with the story of wanting to defend their natural endowment and sovereignty gradually emerging as a rogue or outlaw state, dreaming of nuclear power, decolonizing of one " backyard "that is out there, nestled in a devilish array known as the" axis of evil "(North Korea, Iran, Cuba, etc.).. Would not do much good to argue, for example, with the same ridiculous boldness with which other powers are appealed divine, which preserves within its territory to the oldest geological formation of the planet (Guayana), which could lead to reason that matter is really sacred ground, home of the world if you like, religiously defensible, if already in same tendency to fight stupidity with ridicule. Finally, put in the tone to be free and speak with sovereignty, it must be said that freedom has always been just that: re-shipped shedding griping myths and magic, pop paradigms, fight the power of one, and is touted sacred. Bolivar say that if nature is no opponent to fight against it and master it. For the renegades have no other way to be free indeed.


Comments are closed.